Compiled by a Kingston Hills neighbor from public records and 1997 news coverage. Not an official City or association publication. About this page
The knoll inside the woods, painted.
The woods before 1997
The 12 acres at the end of Luxmore Drive were never part of the neighborhood around them. In 1975 the Ohio company connected to the apartment complex below the woods passed the tract to a group that included Oliver Smith Jr. and Dr. John Montgomery Sr. and Jr., developers of West Town Mall. By 1993 Dr. John L. Montgomery Jr. owned it alone.
Knox County had zoned the land “RB,” general residential. At the time that meant apartments could be built there next to single-family homes without any public hearing. The land is steep. Its only frontage on a public street is the dead end of Luxmore Drive, and the apartment complex below borders it on the north.
Parcel drawn from the survey description in the 1997 deed (Sizemore-Lynch, March 1, 1997); streets traced from OpenStreetMap. Approximate: the deed's measurements do not close exactly. On the north side, The District's private streets and parking run along the property line, within about 10 meters of it; Google Maps marks an entrance there.The top of Luxmore Drive, where the pavement ends, painted.
Spring 1997: the apartment plan
In March 1997 the woods were surveyed. In April the Montgomery family formed a company, Montcarl, LLC, and moved the land into it. Then, as a homeowner later told the paper, “bulldozers showed up one weekend.”
Dr. Montgomery and Mike Carlton planned about 100 small apartments, and every car would have come and gone through Kingston Hills on Luxmore. On May 27 a paid notice in the News-Sentinel called on neighbors to pack that night's County Commission meeting.
The neighbors organize
Residents of Kingston Hills and Kingston Woods went to the Commission “en masse,” but their complaint was postponed. A committee then asked Dr. Montgomery his price for the land. He asked $640,000, and, by one account, had been offered $125,000 a year earlier. “We raised $250,000 in three days,” one of them later said. “But we couldn't negotiate the price down. So we had to find a buyer with some money.”
The corner of Ramsgate and Luxmore Drive, where City Council met on August 11, 1997, painted.
Joining the city
The neighbors turned to the City of Knoxville with an offer: annex our homes, and the new city property taxes will pay for the woods. A petition drew about 290 signatures in a few days. On August 11, 1997, City Council held a special meeting outdoors at the corner of Ramsgate and Luxmore Drive and voted to buy the tract. The contract let the City back out if the annexation fell through. Mayor Victor Ashe told residents the apartments would have played “havoc with your neighborhood,” and said the majority of homeowners agreeing to join the city made the purchase cost-effective.
At the final vote on August 26, residents spoke only in favor and every vote was unanimous. The plan the City adopted for the annexed area says “a greenspace area of about 16 acres will be set aside within the community.” Annexation took effect at midnight on September 26, and that day KUB began putting up the neighborhood's first street lights, starting at Ramsgate and Luxmore. Homes whose owners did not sign stayed in the county, leaving what the paper called a checkerboard; in all, 278 homes came in that fall.
The slope down toward the apartments, painted.
The City buys the woods
On October 9, 1997 the City bought the woods from Montcarl for $523,188 through its Parks and Recreation department, and that fall hired a contractor to reseed the bulldozed ground. City officials said they planned “to restore the land to a passive green area.” The deed itself carries no park restriction.
The regrown woods, painted.
Since then
The cleared slope has grown back into woods. The City has treated the land as a park: it rezoned it as a “City park” in 2003, listed it among its parks in 2010, and named it a Nature Conservation Park in its 2026 parks master plan. No trails or facilities have been built, and the City's one-year land-use map still shows the parcel as residential.
Some 1997 records are still being requested from the City, including a memo on the proposed “Kingston Woods Park” written the week before the final vote. The timeline below lays out every step with its source, and the documents are linked at the bottom of the page.
$523,188City purchase, Oct 9, 1997
~290homeowners asked to be annexed
12.36 acparcel 120PB016
16 acresof greenspace promised in 1997
Where things stand, and what could change
A neighbor asked a good question: how can the woods be a conservation park when the City's land-use map says residential? The answer is that different documents do different jobs. The zoning controls what can be built today, and the land-use map controls what the zoning can be changed to. Each row links to the document it comes from.
NA, Natural Areas, a district the Zoning Code says is meant "to preserve and enhance areas as permanent open space." No housing of any kind is allowed in it. The City first rezoned the woods to open space as a "City park" in 2003.
Controls what can be built today. Housing would need the land rezoned: a public hearing and recommendation by the Planning Commission, then a public hearing and vote by City Council.
The City's adopted land-use plan. Under the City Charter, zoning must conform to it, and a rezoning has to be "consistent with and not in conflict with" it. As drawn, it would support a request to rezone the woods for housing.
It does not allow anything to be built by itself. The plan says public parks "should be zoned OS or NA." The 2003 rezoning report said the map was being changed to show the site as public land; it still shows residential.
"Luxmore Drive Natural Area, 7912 Luxmore Dr." The City lists 12.44 acres, calls it a preserve area in Council District 2, gives driving directions by way of Ramsgate Drive, and posts hours of dawn to dusk with park rules.
Shows how the City runs the land day to day: it is published as a City park, with hours and rules that apply to anyone using it.
It is a listing, not a legal protection. Its 12.44 acres does not match the 12.36 acres in the deed and survey.
"A greenspace area of about 16 acres will be set aside within the community."
The City's written commitment, adopted with the annexation ordinance on August 26, 1997.
It does not name the parcel, and the same Recreation page appears in each plan of service for the area, including one covering 0.42 acres of street. Whether it can be enforced today is a legal question.
The City of Knoxville owns the woods. Its purchase file records a Parks and Recreation purchase for $523,188.
Establishes ownership.
It carries no park restriction, so it does not by itself prevent a sale or other use.
What would have to happen for the woods to change
To build housing: the land would have to be rezoned from NA. That takes a public hearing and recommendation at the Planning Commission, then a public hearing and vote by City Council. Because the land-use map shows residential, a rezoning for housing would fit the plan as it is drawn. A rezoning is an ordinance, and the City Charter lets voters petition to put an ordinance to a referendum. Zoning Code §16.1 · Charter §§409, 411 · how a rezoning worksarchived
To sell the land: the Mayor or a department director would declare it surplus. The sale needs an appraisal, public bids or an auction, notice in the newspaper, online, and on a sign posted on the property at least 14 days before bids open, and approval by City Council. City Code §§2-721, 2-722 · Knoxville Code on Municodearchived
To build park improvements such as trails or parking: a project would go through the City's budget. The 2026 parks master plan lists no project for these woods. Master plan pages
Ways the woods' status could be made more permanent
Update the land-use map to Public Parks, as the 2003 report said would happen. A rezoning for housing would then first need a plan amendment. 2003 rezoning case · 2023 One Year Plan
A conservation easement, a recorded restriction that keeps land natural, which Tennessee law lets the City or a land trust hold. The 2026 parks master plan lists conservation easements among the ways to "formalize the protection" of land (Action 3.1.2). Master plan pages
State or federal park grants. Land improved with Tennessee's Local Parks and Recreation Fund or the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund carries a recorded notice limiting it to public recreation, according to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation.
Questions neighbors can ask the City
Will the land-use map be updated to match the zoning, as the 2003 report said it would?
Does the City consider the 1997 greenspace commitment to apply to these woods?
What public process would come before any change to how the woods are used?
This summary describes what each document says. For how these rules would apply to a specific proposal, Knoxville-Knox County Planning or an attorney can confirm.
Common questions
Who owns the Luxmore Drive Natural Area?
The City of Knoxville. It bought the 12.36-acre tract from Montcarl, LLC on October 9, 1997 for $523,188 through its Parks and Recreation department.
At the dead end of Luxmore Drive in the Kingston Hills neighborhood of West Knoxville, with the apartment complex now called The District below it to the north. Its Knox County parcel number is 120PB016.
In 1997 the owner, Dr. John Montgomery Jr., and Mike Carlton planned about 100 small apartments on the tract, reached only through Luxmore Drive. Neighbors asked the City to annex their homes so the new city taxes would pay for the land, and the City agreed.
The City treats it as one. It rezoned the land as a "City park" in 2003, listed it among its parks in 2010, and named it a Nature Conservation Park in the 2026 parks master plan. No trails or facilities have been built. The City lists it as a park with hours of dawn to dusk and posted rules.
The One Year Plan map, the City's adopted land-use plan, still shows medium density residential. The 2003 rezoning report said it was being changed to show the site as public land, and it never was. The plan itself says public parks should be zoned OS or NA, and the woods are zoned NA.
Its NA zoning allows no housing. Changing that would take a public hearing at the Planning Commission and a public hearing and vote by City Council, and the rezoning would have to be consistent with the land-use map, which currently shows residential. The deed carries no park restriction. How much legal weight the 1997 greenspace commitment carries today is a question for Knoxville-Knox County Planning or an attorney.
Stefan Brundige, a neighbor on Ramsgate Drive, from public records and 1997–98 Knoxville News-Sentinel coverage. It is not a publication of the City of Knoxville or of any neighborhood association. It tells the story from the source documents, and they're all linked.
Timeline
Each entry says where it comes from and links to the document when there is one. Quotes from the 1997–98 Knoxville News-Sentinel appear on the day they ran; the full pages are in the paper's archive, free with a Knox County Public Library card.
The long view
1966 to 2026 · tap a marker to jump to it
Swipe sideways to see the whole chart.
1997, month by month
from survey to purchase
Documents
Every file is a public record. The tag under each one says who holds the original and how it was obtained. KGIS is the Knoxville-Knox County online property map, which links recorded deeds and planning cases. A few terms: a quitclaim deed hands over whatever interest the signer has; an ordinance is a City law and a resolution a formal Council decision; RB, R-1 and OS-1 are zoning categories (county general residential, city single-family, city open space).
Records are still coming in from the City. Leave your email and I'll write when something turns up that changes the picture. Nothing else, and you can stop any time. Name and street are optional. I don't share the list with anyone.
Add a document, a memory, or a correction
Messages go only to Stefan. Name and email are optional; leave an email if you'd like a reply.